Human rights lawyer Sultana Kamal and five university teachers on Sunday filed a public interest litigation writ petition challenging the legality of the police presenting arrested individuals before the media.
The petitioners’ counsel, Jyotirmoy Barua, told New Age that the petition would be moved to a High Court bench concerned when it will resume after the three days’ general strike begins from Monday.
The petitioners also challenged the legality of the police presenting before the media three arrested bloggers, Rasel Pervez alias Rasel, Mashiur Rahman alias Biplob and Subrata Adhikari alias Shuvo.
On April 2, the bloggers were arrested on allegation of posting derogatory remarks about Prophet Mohammad (SM) and Islam on their blogs.
The police presented them before the media on the same day.
Other petitioners include, Jahangirnagar University economics teacher Anu Muhammad, Dhaka University mass communication and journalism department teachers Gitiara Nasreen, Robaet Ferdous and Fahmidul Haq, and DU Bangla department teacher Rafique Ullah Khan.
The petitioners sought a direction on the government authorities, particularly on the deputy commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police Commissioner and Sher-e-Bangla Nagar police station’s sub-inspector Sazzad Hossain, to explain why they should not be directed to personally compensate the three arrested bloggers ‘for the threat and danger to which they have been exposed as a result of producing them before the media.’
The petitioners also sought a directive on the police and the government authorities to refrain from presenting any arrested individual before the media at the stage of investigation or trial.
They also sought court directives to ensure personal safety of the three bloggers in custody and to set them free as they were not arrested on any specific charges.
The petitioners said the police had arrested the three
bloggers, two former Dhaka University students and one still studying in DU for allegedly posting the ‘derogatory comments.’
The police presented them before the media identifying them as bloggers.
The police introduced them to reporters as ‘known atheists and naturalists.’
The petitioners said that at a news conference at the DMP Media Cell on April 2, Detective Branch’s deputy commissioner Nazrul Islam said that as ‘atheists,’ and ‘followers of naturalism’ the arrested bloggers hurt the religious sentiment of people with their derogatory postings on blogs which is a criminal offence.
The petitioners said that they came to know that the three arrested bloggers were produced before the Dhaka Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s court which remanded them in police custody for seven days for interrogation over the allegations.
The petitioners said that production of the arrested before the media was a clear violation of the right to presumption of innocence and to protection against self-incrimination as guaranteed by Articles 33 and 35(3) of the Constitution of the Republic.
Every person is innocent until proven guilty by a competent court of law and that the rights of the three bloggers have been clearly violated by the manner in which the they were presented before the media, said the petitioners.
They said that reports published in the front pages of all daily newspapers with pictures of the three confirmed their arrest and described them as having ‘made derogatory remarks against the Prophet (SM) and in some cases described them as ‘Islam haters.’
The reports created a widespread impression among the public that they are certainly liable for the allegation of offences brought against them, although they are not even accused of any specific offence, said the petitioners. (
Source)